Southall Stories · Preliminary findings · October 2026

Southall Air Monitoring 2018–19

Weekly VOC results from laboratory samples at 29 monitoring points around the former gasworks, June 2018 to May 2019. They were extracted from all four disclosed attachments, and each value is checked against its source page. Residents' own odour reports from 2017 to 2019 are set against the hourly wind and the monitoring.

Preliminary: describes the monitoring; it does not measure anyone's exposure or health

An independent residents' investigation, not peer-reviewed. It uses the developer's own monitoring results, released under the Environmental Information Regulations (request 19-1235). Corrections are welcome.

Naphthalene hot spots
3.5–4.8×

Naphthalene at Air 8, Air 9, Air 5 and Air 1, against the median of all stations sampled the same week.

Not just traffic
1.8–2.8×

Benzene at the same stations. Naphthalene rises far more than benzene, which is not the pattern expected from traffic alone.

Solvent in the park
475 µg/m³

Trichloroethene at Air 19 in the week to 4 April 2019, with 400 at Air 4. The site's own 2016 risk assessment had found TCE in its north-east groundwater. The source is not settled.

Highest naphthalene
248 µg/m³

Highest weekly naphthalene, Air 5, November 2018. The WHO indoor guideline is 10, as a yearly average.

No fall after closure
×0.94

Southern-boundary naphthalene in April 2019, after the soil hospital stopped, against its operating months, once wind is allowed for.

Odour follows the wind
73% vs 34%

Share of 104 timed odour reports near Scotts Road that came with wind from the gasworks, against chance. Wind from FM Conway: 12% vs 48%.

Monitoring came late
25 Sept 2018

When the tubes at Air 7, 8 and 9, later the highest readers, were first deployed: after the summer 2018 peak of complaints.

The two main chemicals

Most of this page is about two compounds. Both come from coal tar, which gasworks left in the ground.

Naphthalene

What it is. The chemical that gives mothballs and coal tar their smell. It was one of the site's main risk drivers in the 2008 remediation strategy and in Atkins' 2016 risk assessment.

Why it matters. Classed as possibly carcinogenic to humans (IARC Group 2B). It can damage red blood cells, and PHE said in July 2019 that people with G6PD deficiency are at greater risk. In March 2019 PHE said levels here "should urgently be reduced".

What is G6PD deficiency, and why Southall?

G6PD is an enzyme that protects red blood cells. People who inherit too little of it can suffer sudden breakdown of red blood cells (haemolysis) after contact with certain triggers, and naphthalene is a known one: mothball exposure has caused it, especially in babies and young children. The gene sits on the X chromosome, so it mainly affects boys and men. It is far more common in families of South Asian, African, Middle Eastern and Mediterranean heritage than in white British families. Around three-quarters of residents of the ward next to the site were of Asian heritage (2008 health impact assessment). No assessment we have found asked how many people downwind might carry it.

Standard: no UK legal limit outdoors. WHO indoor guideline 10 µg/m³, as a yearly average.

Benzene

What it is. A component of petrol and of coal tar that evaporates easily. In towns it comes mainly from traffic, but gasworks soil and groundwater carry it too. Atkins used it as the "conservative marker" for this site.

What is a "conservative marker"?

Rather than judge every chemical in the mix, Atkins tracked benzene as a stand-in for all of them. "Conservative" means cautious: benzene has the strictest legal limit, so the argument was that if benzene stayed low, everything else would be safe too. The weakness here is that the mix did not move together. At the hot-spot stations naphthalene rose far more than benzene, so a check based on benzene alone understated what neighbours were breathing.

Why it matters. A known human carcinogen (IARC Group 1), linked to leukaemia, with no known safe level.

Standard: legal limit 5 µg/m³, as a yearly average.

Why compare them. Traffic raises benzene more than naphthalene. Near the soil hospital the opposite happened: naphthalene rose 3.5–4.8 times the network median, benzene only 1.8–2.8 times. That suggests the ground, not the roads.

Where readings run high

Each dot is a monitoring point on the Blackwell C897 plan. Its colour shows how that station typically reads against the median of every station sampled in the same week. Comparing within a week removes the effect of weather and season. Use the buttons below to switch the plan between naphthalene and benzene.

Show
← tap to switch
Blackwell C897 monitoring plan with Air and ES stations and the user's area groupings

Coloured outlines group the stations by area: Green (soil hospital), Blue (Spencer Street), Yellow (Queens Road), Pink (Blair Peach School) and Purple (Beaconsfield Road). Air 5C, 17–22 and ES09B were added in 2019 and are not on this plan; they appear in the table below.

Over time

Monthly medians for the five stations that read highest (Air 9, Air 8, Air 5, Air 1 and ES14) against the rest of the network. Months are placed by the end of each tube's exposure period. Air 8 and Air 9 start in late September 2018, so the June–August hot-spot line rests on Air 1, Air 5 and ES14 alone.

Dashed lines are reference values only. 5 µg/m³ is the UK annual-mean objective for benzene, and 10 µg/m³ is the WHO indoor annual guideline for naphthalene. Weekly tube results cannot show compliance with an annual standard.

All stations

Click a column heading to sort. "× week median" is the typical ratio to all stations sampled that week. Means use the reporting limit for non-detects, which barely changes these figures.

The spring 2019 trichloroethene readings

What it is. Trichloroethene (TCE) is a man-made solvent, used for degreasing metal and once for dry cleaning and for testing asphalt. The International Agency for Research on Cancer classes it as a known human carcinogen (Group 1, kidney cancer). Since April 2016 its use in the UK and EU has needed specific authorisation under REACH. It is not a normal product of coal-gas manufacture, though it was found in the site's ground (see below).

Why it matters. These are the highest readings against a health guideline in the whole dataset. One was off site, in a public park. We have found no record that the official explanation was tested. And PHE averaged the readings into a site mean of about 2 µg/m³, where they disappear.

For one week (exposures ending 4 April 2019), two tubes recorded TCE far above anything else: Air 4 on the north-east boundary and Air 19 in Minet Country Park, west of the site across the Grand Union Canal. The site lies between them. Every station in between read below the reporting limit, and the winds that week were light and variable.

It was not a single week. Before March 2019 TCE was found only five times in nine months, never above 2.1. Then:

  • 21 March: low levels (2–6) at 15 of 22 stations;
  • 4 April: 400 and 475;
  • 11 April: 15 at Air 8 and Air 21;
  • 25 April: 40 at Air 8 and 38 at Air 12, with trans-1,2-DCE at four stations;
  • 10 May: 11 at ES09.
Compound (week to 4 Apr)Air 4Air 19Others
Trichloroethene, main table400475<1.3
Trichloroethene, TIC screen TIC<1.0245.8—
trans-1,2-Dichloroethene4345<1
cis-1,2-Dichloroethene<1<0.8<1
(Z)-1,2-dichloroethylene TIC2018.2—
p-Cymene (suppressant marker)<1.0<1.0<1–1.4

Chemtest job 19-12081, samples 807066 (Air 4) and 807070 (Air 19). µg/m³. TIC = tentatively identified compound. The TIC "(Z)" form is the cis isomer by name, but it was not confirmed by the quantified cis-DCE test.

Something released TCE repeatedly in spring 2019. The run begins the week the soil hospital stopped treating soil (end of March) and lasts through its dismantling: by 15 May, Ealing said, 90% of it had been removed. Cleaning and degreasing plant before it is taken away is a common use for a solvent. But TCE was also in the ground. Atkins' 2016 risk assessment puts the site's worst TCE at one borehole in the zone along the northern boundary with Beaconsfield Road, an old gasworks waste area: groundwater up to 1,008 µg/l, a hundred times the water standard. TCE was a clean-up target in that zone only, and Air 4 stood on that boundary.

The cis-DCE clue. When TCE breaks down in soil or groundwater, bacteria turn it mainly into cis-1,2-dichloroethene. Cis-DCE was not detected in any air tube all year; only the trans form was found (43 and 45). We first read that as a sign of a fresh solvent. It is not a reliable sign: soil-gas probes on the site in June 2017, before the main works, also held TCE (3 µg/m³) with no cis-DCE. So disturbing the north-east ground is now the most direct explanation for Air 4. It does not explain Air 19, a kilometre away in the park. This is an inference, not proof.

The certificates. Air 4's own screen of tentatively identified compounds gives TCE <1.0, against 400 in the main table. PHE's reports use 400.10 and 475.3, which are not the printed values.

Explanations. Atkins, followed by PHE, suggested road asphalting or off-site tarmac plants. Yet Atkins' own 2016 risk assessment had found TCE in the site's north-east groundwater and made it a clean-up target there; on the record we hold, that finding was not mentioned when the readings were explained. On-site surfacing between the two tubes would fit their positions better than a distant plant does. Hot asphalt itself is not a recognised TCE source, though TCE has been used to clean asphalt equipment and to test it. A laboratory or handling artefact cannot be ruled out for 4 April, but it does not explain the later weeks. Decommissioning, surfacing and solvent-use records for March–May 2019 would settle it. They are the subject of an information request. Hypothesis

After the soil hospital closed

The soil treatment hospital stopped treating soil at the end of March 2019 and was dismantled through April. If it was the only source, the southern-boundary readings should have fallen when treatment stopped. They did not.

April's winds came mostly from the north and east, which pushed site air onto the southern boundary and away from everything else. That explains the widening gap, but wind only matters if something is still being emitted.

Allowing for each station and for the hours it spent downwind of the hospital, April readings at the hot-spot stations were statistically the same as in the operating months. Levels fell only in May.

Wind-adjusted, hot-spot stationsNaphthaleneBenzeneToluene
April 2019 vs operating months×0.94×0.77×0.68
May 2019 vs operating months×0.35×0.34×0.37
All hours downwind vs none×11×4.0×3.4

Hot-spot stations: Air 1, 5, 7, 8, 9 and ES14. September 2018 to May 2019; Northolt wind (Heathrow agrees). 95% intervals for April include 1 for all three compounds.

The wrong kind of wind

In July 2018 Ealing's council leader said the smells had "become worse as a result of current high temperatures and unusual wind directions" (MyLondon, 13 July 2018). Atkins later put the summer readings down partly to winds that were "unusually from the north east". Residents' own records show what that meant: when the wind blew from the site, people downwind smelled it.

Residents logged odour in Facebook posts, e-mails to the council and the Environment Agency, tweets and Nextdoor threads. Each timed report was set against the hourly wind at Northolt. A report "fits the site" when the wind was blowing from the site toward the person reporting.

ReportsTimedWind from siteChanceWind from ConwayChance
CASH Facebook group, Feb–May 2019 (all areas)3361%36%——
E-mails, 2018–19, Scotts Road area: one resident5463%34%15%48%
E-mails, 2018–19, Scotts Road area: a neighbour4185%34%7%48%
Tweets, 2018–19, Scotts Road area3256%29%25%50%
NESW14%28%Former gasworks ↗north / north-east← FM Conway, Tarmacasphalt plants, westScotts Road area

Where the wind came from. Each orange petal points the way the wind was blowing from when someone in the Scotts Road area of Southall Green, south of the soil hospital, logged an odour (98 timed reports with wind, 2018–19, Northolt hourly wind). The dashed outline is every hour in the same months. The shaded bands are the directions tested: the gasworks to the north and north-east, and the FM Conway and Tarmac asphalt plants to the west. Most reports came on north-easterly winds, which blow less than a third of the time. Bearings are approximate; not to scale.

Rotating the test direction acts as a placebo: in the 2019 Facebook reports, wind from the opposite side of the site accompanied 2 reports against 11 expected. From the Scotts Road area, the gasworks lies to the north and north-east and the FM Conway and Tarmac asphalt plants to the west, so the two directions do not overlap.

13 June 2017, 21:30. Ealing's nuisance team visits the Scotts Road area and says the odour there is from the gasworks.

13 June 2017, after 23:00. The same team visits a home on a nearby street to the south, smells tar there, and puts it down to FM Conway.

From 23:00 to midnight the wind was from the north or east-north-east: from the gasworks toward that home. It swung south only after midnight. In the same month Hillingdon removed some Southall complaints from FM Conway's record because they were "attributed to contamination remediation works at the Southall Gas works Site". Both plants were real sources that summer, but complaints were not always assigned to the right one.

The odour suppressant

On 24–27 March 2019 residents reported "air freshener", "deodorant" and a soap-like taste. In that week's tubes, and in no other spring 2019 week, fragrance compounds appear at several stations: limonene (23.6 µg/m³ at Air 18), pinene and cymenes. No product name appears in any council, Environment Agency or developer e-mail.

Self-reported health

In a September–October 2018 questionnaire, 32 of 50 residents said the works had made their health worse. The commonest symptoms were throat irritation (56%), headaches (54%), cough and eye irritation (48%). Respondents chose to take part and there is no comparison group, so this describes experiences; it does not measure prevalence or cause.

Monitoring arrived after the complaints

PeriodResident odour reportsVOC tube monitoring
May–July 201763 cases logged by Ealingnone: on-site total-VOC sensors for workers only
14 May – 3 June 201834 coded reportsnone: first tubes collected 8 June
June – mid-July 2018about 1257–10 stations, no printed exposure dates; Air 1 and ES14 only near the hospital
From 25 September 2018—21 stations, including Air 7, 8 and 9

Winter was supposed to be better

In autumn 2018 residents were told summer was the worst period. Atkins' technical notes (October and November 2018) called summer the time of "potentially higher VOC emissions". Its FAQs said the yearly average would be lower because "temperatures over the course of a year are lower". PHE's first report said concentrations "during cooler weather periods will decrease".

At the ten stations monitored in both periods, the opposite happened:

Benzene, µg/m³02468JunJulAugSepOctNovDecJanFebMarAprMay20182019Expected: below the summer averagelegal limit 5 (yearly average)Jun: 2.45 µg/m³Jul: 2.12 µg/m³Aug: 2.65 µg/m³Sep: 2.58 µg/m³Oct: 2.62 µg/m³Nov: 4.9 µg/m³Dec: 2.05 µg/m³Jan: 7.8 µg/m³Feb: 7.76 µg/m³Mar: 5.17 µg/m³Apr: 4.32 µg/m³May: 1.8 µg/m³
Naphthalene, µg/m³051015202530JunJulAugSepOctNovDecJanFebMarAprMay20182019Expected: below the summer averageWHO indoor guideline 10 (yearly)Jun: 7.34 µg/m³Jul: 11.87 µg/m³Aug: 4.32 µg/m³Sep: 13.63 µg/m³Oct: 17.07 µg/m³Nov: 25.32 µg/m³Dec: 14.32 µg/m³Jan: 11.7 µg/m³Feb: 21.08 µg/m³Mar: 11.5 µg/m³Apr: 14.98 µg/m³May: 5.5 µg/m³

Monthly mean of all tubes at the same ten stations (Air 1–5, ES06, ES09, ES14, ES15, ES16). Dashed line: the summer 2018 average, which Atkins, PHE and Ealing expected later months to stay below (shaded). Hollow point: January 2019, only 5–9 tubes. The limit and guideline apply to yearly averages and are shown for scale only.

Same 10 stationsSummer 2018 meanNov 2018 – Apr 2019 meanStations whose median rose
Benzene2.45.38 of 10 (p = 0.008)
Naphthalene7.317.810 of 10 (p = 0.002)

µg/m³. Stations Air 1–5, ES06, ES09, ES14, ES15, ES16. The rise sits mainly in December–April; October–December benzene shows none. The result holds with non-detects at half the reporting limit and without undated June–July tubes.

Then PHE's argument changed. Its second and third reports said colder weather would lower exposure, because people stay indoors. The fourth says nothing about seasons.

Caution: winter air disperses pollution less well, and traffic and home heating add benzene and naphthalene everywhere in winter. So higher winter readings prove the forecast wrong, but not on their own that the site emitted more. The same-week comparisons on the map allow for that, because every station shares the same weather.

Highest results and the standards

The highest single week for each compound, set beside the nearest legal limit or health guideline. All values are µg/m³.

CompoundHighest weekResultUK legal limitHealth guidelines
NaphthaleneAir 5, 7–14 Nov 2018248.2None WHO indoor: 10 (annual mean). US EPA reference concentration: 3 (lifetime).
BenzeneAir 8, 14–21 Nov 201846.45 (annual mean; Air Quality Standards Regulations 2010) WHO: no safe level; 1.7 for a 1-in-100,000 lifetime cancer risk.
TrichloroetheneAir 19, 26 Mar – 4 Apr 2019475None WHO: 2.3 (1-in-a-million lifetime cancer risk); 230 (1-in-10,000).

Other high weeks: naphthalene 189.5 (Air 5), 177.7 and 172 (ES14); benzene 42 and 41 (Air 9 and Air 8, March 2019); TCE 400 (Air 4).

These standards are averages over a year or a lifetime. One week above them is not a breach of the law, nor proof of harm. But the high weeks were not isolated: Air 5, Air 8, Air 9 and ES14 read high week after week. PHE's highest benzene for Air 8 is 56.3, which does not match the certificate (46.4).

Residents were told something simpler. In September 2018 Berkeley told them emissions were all "within legal limits". Yet that same month, at Ealing's air quality scrutiny panel, councillors asked whether the benzene standard had ever been breached and "heard that it had been breached" (official minutes, 27 September 2018). Where, when and over what period was not recorded. In August 2019 PHE accepted that benzene and toluene had exceeded WHO levels in summer 2018, but expected "no significant harm". We have found no assessment that considered the compounds together, or repeated high weeks over two years.

Things to know about the data